3 Ways to Keep Your Client’s Head Up!(Including Dynamic Options)
35th Annual International Seating Symposium
To receive CEUs for this session, please go to https://www.rstce.pitt.edu/RSTCE_Webinar/2019/RST_CE_IC33_19.html
You’ve positioned the client. You’ve tried every head support available. And yet your client spends most of their time looking at their lap. This course will discuss various strategies to optimize head position. First, we will explore strategies beyond the head support, including specific positioning interventions and addressing visual issues. Second, we will explore posterior head supports in depth, matching specific features to client needs. Third, we will explore other options which may be required if posterior support alone is inadequate, including anterior head support. Case studies will be used throughout.
Michelle Lange, OTR/L, ABDA, ATP/SMS
Access to Independence, United States
Michelle is an occupational therapist. She is the co-editor of Seating and Wheeled Mobility: a clinical resource guide, editor of Fundamentals in Assistive Technology, 4th ed., NRRTS Continuing Education Curriculum Coordinator and Clinical Editor of Directions magazine. Michelle is on the teaching faculty of RESNA, a member of the Clinician Task Force, a certified ATP, certified SMS and is a Senior Disability Analyst of the ABDA.
Many wheelchair users have decreased head control and may sit with the head in a suboptimal position. An upright and aligned head position is critical for vision, breathing and swallow. The position of the head is dependent on far more than the head support used. The position of the pelvis and trunk greatly impact head position, as does overall position in space. Numerous strategies may be employed to optimize head control and position.
The participant will be able to list 3 causes of decreased head control.
The participant will be able to list 3 strategies to improve head positioning in addition to the head support.
The participant will be able to match specific head support features to client needs.
Decreased head control is typically caused by decreased neck strength or paralysis. Suboptimal head positions may also be caused by:
hyperextension of the neck in compensation for poor trunk control
forward tonal pull
visual impairments such as midline shifts and cortical visual impairment
an attempt to optimize swallowing
an attempt to optimize breathing
It is important to identify the cause of a suboptimal head position before choosing the best intervention.
Head position is quite dependent upon the position of the trunk and pelvis. If the pelvis is in a posterior tilt, the trunk will be flexed or kyphotic. Due to the flexion of the trunk, the neck will also be flexed and any attempt to right the head will result in neck hyperextension. If the pelvis is in an anterior tilt, the trunk will be extended or lordotic. This may lead to hyperextension of the neck as the client attempts to keep the trunk upright and the head balanced. In general, the pelvis should be placed in a neutral alignment, if possible, and the trunk supported in an upright posture. If the shoulders remain protracted or rounded, seating interventions to promote scapular retraction can help the client maintain a more upright head position.
For people with decreased head control, gravity can pull the head forward. Opening the seat to back angle or providing some posterior tilt in space can reduce the influence of gravity on head position and facilitate head control. For clients with a non-reducible kyphosis, the seat to back angle can be increased and/or tilt used until the head is over or just behind the pelvis. This will allow the client to balance their head over the kyphosis without neck hyperextension. In clients without kyphosis, a significant amount of recline or tilt will often maintain the head in contact with a head support but is not a functional position and may even result in further loss of head control.
If the evaluation team suspects that vision is impacting head position, a referral can be made to a Neuro-Optometrist for evaluation and recommendations. Some interventions may improve head alignment, particularly in the case of midline shifts. For clients with Cortical Visual Impairment (CVI), atypical head positions are to be expected, as well as allowed. The client may need to assume a specific position to optimize vision – often with the head slightly forward and/or tilted.
Once head position has been optimized through these strategies, the evaluation team can determine the most appropriate head support.
Quite a variety of head supports are available to meet individual need. These head supports have unique features designed to match specific requirements. Posterior head supports are by far the most common and may include lateral support. Collars provide support under the jaw and the suboccipital shelf. Forehead supports or straps provide support anterior to the forehead. One product provides support superior to the head, allowing for rotation and some limited flexion and extension while supporting/suspending the head in an upright position.
Wheelchair head supports are commonly referred to as head rests as many clients use this seating component to rest against. A simple posterior head support provides a surface for the occipital area to rest against but offers little postural support and cannot prevent neck hyperextension unless placed at an angle to cup the suboccipital shelf. Some posterior head supports do include a generic contour designed to contact the suboccipital shelf. Other supports include a separate suboccipital pad designed to be placed inferior to this shelf to provide some actual head support and to limit neck hyperextension in combination with a separate occipital pad.
Lateral supports can be used to limit lateral neck flexion and rotation. When this position is difficult to correct, 3 point contact may be required. This requires lateral support at either side of the head, as well as lateral support along one jaw, often provided by the suboccipital pad. This force and counterforce provide neck alignment.
Materials and upholstery can be customized to meet an individual’s needs, as well. Softer materials are appropriate when the head support becomes a weight bearing surface, such as when the client spends a great deal of time tilted or reclined. Softer materials may also be indicated when a client exerts significant force against an area of the head support. Smoother upholstery can reduce friction which leads to actual hair loss on the back on the scalp for many clients using head supports.
Dynamic head supports move in response to client forces and movement. Providing some movement can diffuse force, protecting both the client and the mounting hardware from harm. This movement may also reduce overall tone. If the component moves too far posteriorly, many clients may startle, hyperextend, or exhibit a reflexive response.
Collars may be explored if a posterior head support cannot be found that can maintain an optimal head position. Support is provided to the head under the jaw and under the suboccipital shelf. Some clients may actually demonstrate an increase in head control as they are now able to move their head within a limited range of motion. Specific collars are available which can be used with clients using a trach and/or ventilator. Certain collars cannot be safely used in transport.
Anterior forehead support is truly a last resort option when nothing else has worked. Forehead support may be a swing-away pad(s) in front of the forehead or a strap across the forehead. Straps which move with the client’s head (typically allowing some rotation) are more likely to remain in position. Use of anterior forehead support may result in loss of residual head control the neck muscles are not as active. These options cannot be used in transport and a soft cervical collar is used instead.
A critical part of wheelchair seating is achieving and maintaining an upright and aligned head position. Positioning the head involves far more than choosing a head support. Using a combination of seating strategies as well as matching product features to an individual’s needs will improve the final outcome for the client.
Uyama, S., & Hanaki, K. (2015). Seating arrangements for children with insufficient head control: lessons from trials using the i2i head & neck positioning & support system. Journal of physical therapy science, 27(3), 947-950.
Ukita, A., Nishimura, S., Kishigami, H., & Hatta, T. (2015). Backrest shape affects head–neck alignment and seated pressure. Journal of healthcare engineering, 6(2), 179-192.
Field, D., & Livingstone, R. (2013). Clinical tools that measure sitting posture, seated postural control or functional abilities in children with motor impairments: a systematic review. Clinical rehabilitation, 27(11), 994-1004.